You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Moonstruck sleep: Synchronization of human sleep with the moon cycle under field conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.abe0465 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leandro Casiraghi, Ignacio Spiousas, Gideon P. Dunster, Kaitlyn McGlothlen, Eduardo Fernández-Duque, Claudia Valeggia, Horacio O. de la Iglesia |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,634 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 235 | 14% |
| Japan | 80 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 78 | 5% |
| India | 38 | 2% |
| Canada | 36 | 2% |
| Spain | 33 | 2% |
| Germany | 25 | 2% |
| Argentina | 24 | 1% |
| France | 21 | 1% |
| Other | 235 | 14% |
| Unknown | 829 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1244 | 76% |
| Scientists | 306 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 51 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 29 | 2% |
| Unknown | 4 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 18% |
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 32 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 11% |
| Psychology | 9 | 7% |
| Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 24% |
| Unknown | 38 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2527. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,880
of 24,544,893 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#37
of 11,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169
of 516,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#3
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,544,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.