You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hemispheric Asymmetry for Affective Stimulus Processing in Healthy Subjects–A fMRI Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0046931 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Esther Beraha, Jonathan Eggers, Catherine Hindi Attar, Stefan Gutwinski, Florian Schlagenhauf, Meline Stoy, Philipp Sterzer, Thorsten Kienast, Andreas Heinz, Felix Bermpohl |
| Abstract |
While hemispheric specialization of language processing is well established, lateralization of emotion processing is still under debate. Several conflicting hypotheses have been proposed, including right hemisphere hypothesis, valence asymmetry hypothesis and region-specific lateralization hypothesis. However, experimental evidence for these hypotheses remains inconclusive, partly because direct comparisons between hemispheres are scarce. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 42 | 34% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 35 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2012.
All research outputs
#18,349,015
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#154,641
of 202,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,531
of 174,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,315
of 4,659 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,659 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.