You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prehospital Electronic Patient Care Report Systems: Early Experiences from Emergency Medical Services Agency Leaders
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0032692 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adam B. Landman, Christopher H. Lee, Comilla Sasson, Carin M. Van Gelder, Leslie A. Curry |
Abstract |
As the United States embraces electronic health records (EHRs), improved emergency medical services (EMS) information systems are also a priority; however, little is known about the experiences of EMS agencies as they adopt and implement electronic patient care report (e-PCR) systems. We sought to characterize motivations for adoption of e-PCR systems, challenges associated with adoption and implementation, and emerging implementation strategies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 95 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
Researcher | 12 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Other | 21 | 21% |
Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 32% |
Computer Science | 11 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 12% |
Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,255,084
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#62,000
of 197,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,303
of 157,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#773
of 3,524 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,524 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.