↓ Skip to main content

Application of geoaccumulation index and enrichment factors on the assessment of heavy metal pollution in the sediments

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Environmental Science & Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of geoaccumulation index and enrichment factors on the assessment of heavy metal pollution in the sediments
Published in
Journal of Environmental Science & Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, January 2013
DOI 10.1080/10934529.2012.717810
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nur Aliaa Shafie, Ahmad Zaharin Aris, Mohamad Pauzi Zakaria, Hazzeman Haris, Wan Ying Lim, Noorain Mohd Isa

Abstract

An investigative study was carried out in Langat River to determine the heavy metal pollution in the sediment with 22 sampling stations selected for the collection of sediment samples. The sediment samples were digested and analyzed for extractable metal ((48)Cd, (29)Cu, (30)Zn, (33)As, (82)Pb) using the Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS). Parameters, such as pH, Eh, electrical conductivity (EC), salinity, cation exchange capacity (CEC) and loss on ignition (LOI) were also determined. The assessment of heavy metal pollution was derived using the enrichment factors (EF) and geoaccumulation index (I(geo)). This study revealed that the sediment is predominantly by As > Cd > Pb > Zn > Cu. As recorded the highest EF value at 187.45 followed by Cd (100.59), Pb (20.32), Zn (12.42) and Cu (3.46). This is similar to the I(geo), which indicates that the highest level goes to As (2.2), exhibits moderately polluted. Meanwhile, Cd recorded 1.8 and Pb (0.23), which illustrates that both of these elements vary from unpolluted to moderately polluted. The Cu and Zn levels are below 0, which demonstrates background concentrations. The findings are expected to update the current status of the heavy metal pollution as well as creating awareness concerning the security of the river water as a drinking water source.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 88 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Student > Master 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 30 33%
Chemistry 10 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 10%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,253,344
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Science & Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering
#383
of 635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,391
of 280,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Science & Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.