↓ Skip to main content

LDx: Estimation of Linkage Disequilibrium from High-Throughput Pooled Resequencing Data

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
LDx: Estimation of Linkage Disequilibrium from High-Throughput Pooled Resequencing Data
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0048588
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison F. Feder, Dmitri A. Petrov, Alan O. Bergland

Abstract

High-throughput pooled resequencing offers significant potential for whole genome population sequencing. However, its main drawback is the loss of haplotype information. In order to regain some of this information, we present LDx, a computational tool for estimating linkage disequilibrium (LD) from pooled resequencing data. LDx uses an approximate maximum likelihood approach to estimate LD (r(2)) between pairs of SNPs that can be observed within and among single reads. LDx also reports r(2) estimates derived solely from observed genotype counts. We demonstrate that the LDx estimates are highly correlated with r(2) estimated from individually resequenced strains. We discuss the performance of LDx using more stringent quality conditions and infer via simulation the degree to which performance can improve based on read depth. Finally we demonstrate two possible uses of LDx with real and simulated pooled resequencing data. First, we use LDx to infer genomewide patterns of decay of LD with physical distance in D. melanogaster population resequencing data. Second, we demonstrate that r(2) estimates from LDx are capable of distinguishing alternative demographic models representing plausible demographic histories of D. melanogaster.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
Austria 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 132 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 36%
Researcher 36 25%
Student > Master 12 8%
Professor 8 5%
Student > Bachelor 6 4%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 12 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 15%
Computer Science 3 2%
Environmental Science 2 1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 17 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2013.
All research outputs
#2,473,203
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#31,208
of 202,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,741
of 183,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#602
of 4,827 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,827 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.