You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Drosophila Model of ALS: Human ALS-Associated Mutation in VAP33A Suggests a Dominant Negative Mechanism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0002334 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anuradha Ratnaparkhi, George M. Lawless, Felix E. Schweizer, Peyman Golshani, George R. Jackson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 129 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 38% |
| Neuroscience | 23 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,836,369
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#68,229
of 199,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,124
of 83,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#166
of 393 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 393 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.