You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
EMA’s mishandling of an investigation into suspected serious neurological harms of HPV vaccines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111470 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter C Gøtzsche, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 383 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 37 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 20 | 5% |
| Italy | 11 | 3% |
| Denmark | 6 | 2% |
| Germany | 6 | 2% |
| Japan | 6 | 2% |
| Spain | 5 | 1% |
| France | 4 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 32 | 8% |
| Unknown | 253 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 339 | 89% |
| Scientists | 20 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 33% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 20% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 251. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#150,297
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#29
of 1,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,561
of 537,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 537,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.