↓ Skip to main content

Towards improving phenotype representation in OWL

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Semantics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards improving phenotype representation in OWL
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Semantics, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/2041-1480-3-s2-s5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank Loebe, Frank Stumpf, Robert Hoehndorf, Heinrich Herre, Loebe F, Stumpf F, Hoehndorf R, Herre H

Abstract

Phenotype ontologies are used in species-specific databases for the annotation of mutagenesis experiments and to characterize human diseases. The Entity-Quality (EQ) formalism is a means to describe complex phenotypes based on one or more affected entities and a quality. EQ-based definitions have been developed for many phenotype ontologies, including the Human and Mammalian Phenotype ontologies.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 9%
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 19 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 36%
Researcher 7 32%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 7 32%
Engineering 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Physics and Astronomy 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2012.
All research outputs
#2,490,795
of 4,681,522 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#126
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,536
of 81,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,681,522 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.