↓ Skip to main content

Non-participation in population-based disease prevention programs in general practice

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-participation in population-based disease prevention programs in general practice
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-856
Pubmed ID
Authors

Berber Koopmans, Mark MJ Nielen, François G Schellevis, Joke C Korevaar

Abstract

The number of people with a chronic disease will strongly increase in the next decades. Therefore, prevention of disease becomes increasingly important. The aim of this systematic review was to identify factors that negatively influence participation in population-based disease prevention programs in General Practice and to establish whether the program type is related to non-participation levels.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 22%
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 16%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Psychology 4 6%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 14 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2012.
All research outputs
#2,963,696
of 12,372,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,163
of 8,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,316
of 129,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#22
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.