↓ Skip to main content

How Should Health Professional Education Respond to Widespread Racial and Ethnic Health Inequity and Police Brutality?

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Should Health Professional Education Respond to Widespread Racial and Ethnic Health Inequity and Police Brutality?
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, February 2021
DOI 10.1001/amajethics.2021.127
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alden M Landry, Rose L Molina, Regan Marsh, Emma Hartswick, Raquel Sofia Sandoval, Nora Osman, Leonor Fernandez

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Librarian 1 2%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 29 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Computer Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 30 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,928,288
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,378
of 540,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 540,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.