↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: A systematic, large-scale comparison of transcription factor binding site models

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: A systematic, large-scale comparison of transcription factor binding site models
Published in
BMC Genomics, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-2818-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Hombach, Jana Marie Schwarz, Peter N. Robinson, Markus Schuelke, Dominik Seelow

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,811,358
of 22,881,154 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#7,581
of 10,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,134
of 363,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#198
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,666 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.