↓ Skip to main content

Diversity of the Neglected and Underutilized Crop Species of Importance in Benin

Overview of attention for article published in The Scientific World Journal, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diversity of the Neglected and Underutilized Crop Species of Importance in Benin
Published in
The Scientific World Journal, April 2012
DOI 10.1100/2012/932947
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Dansi, R. Vodouhè, P. Azokpota, H. Yedomonhan, P. Assogba, A. Adjatin, Y. L. Loko, I. Dossou-Aminon, K. Akpagana

Abstract

Many of the plant species that are cultivated for food across the world are neglected and underutilized. To assess their diversity in Benin and identify the priority species and establish their research needs, a survey was conducted in 50 villages distributed throughout the country. The study revealed 41 neglected and underutilized crop species (NUCS) among which 19 were identified as of priority base on 10 criteria among which included their extent and degree of consumption. Reasons for neglect vary with the producers and the agricultural technicians. Market surveys revealed that NUCS are important source of household incomes and substantially contribute to poverty reduction. Review of the literature available revealed that most of the species are rich in nutrients and have some proven medicinal values and the promotion of their use would help in combating malnutrition and improving the health status of the local populations. The knowledge gaps and research needs are immense on most of the species identified as no concrete scientific data is nationally available. In terms of research, almost all has to be done starting from basic ethnobotanical investigation. The results will help the scientists and students willing to conduct research on NUCS in Benin to better orient their research programs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ghana 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 284 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 14%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Lecturer 16 6%
Other 49 17%
Unknown 79 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 113 39%
Environmental Science 17 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Arts and Humanities 7 2%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 92 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Scientific World Journal
#747
of 2,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,903
of 174,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Scientific World Journal
#76
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.