↓ Skip to main content

Of Mice, Birds, and Men: The Mouse Ultrasonic Song System Has Some Features Similar to Humans and Song-Learning Birds

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
23 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
392 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Of Mice, Birds, and Men: The Mouse Ultrasonic Song System Has Some Features Similar to Humans and Song-Learning Birds
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0046610
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo Arriaga, Eric P. Zhou, Erich D. Jarvis

Abstract

Humans and song-learning birds communicate acoustically using learned vocalizations. The characteristic features of this social communication behavior include vocal control by forebrain motor areas, a direct cortical projection to brainstem vocal motor neurons, and dependence on auditory feedback to develop and maintain learned vocalizations. These features have so far not been found in closely related primate and avian species that do not learn vocalizations. Male mice produce courtship ultrasonic vocalizations with acoustic features similar to songs of song-learning birds. However, it is assumed that mice lack a forebrain system for vocal modification and that their ultrasonic vocalizations are innate. Here we investigated the mouse song system and discovered that it includes a motor cortex region active during singing, that projects directly to brainstem vocal motor neurons and is necessary for keeping song more stereotyped and on pitch. We also discovered that male mice depend on auditory feedback to maintain some ultrasonic song features, and that sub-strains with differences in their songs can match each other's pitch when cross-housed under competitive social conditions. We conclude that male mice have some limited vocal modification abilities with at least some neuroanatomical features thought to be unique to humans and song-learning birds. To explain our findings, we propose a continuum hypothesis of vocal learning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 392 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 3%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 366 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 111 28%
Researcher 77 20%
Student > Master 36 9%
Student > Bachelor 30 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 55 14%
Unknown 60 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 133 34%
Neuroscience 78 20%
Psychology 32 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 3%
Linguistics 10 3%
Other 54 14%
Unknown 74 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 164. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2022.
All research outputs
#242,003
of 24,950,117 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,535
of 216,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,167
of 179,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#51
of 4,577 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,950,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,577 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.