↓ Skip to main content

Impact of compressed sensing on clinically relevant metrics for ambulatory ECG monitoring

Overview of attention for article published in Electronics Letters, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of compressed sensing on clinically relevant metrics for ambulatory ECG monitoring
Published in
Electronics Letters, February 2015
DOI 10.1049/el.2014.4188
Authors

D. Craven, B. McGinley, L. Kilmartin, M. Glavin, E. Jones

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 28%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 61%
Computer Science 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,516,544
of 17,125,476 outputs
Outputs from Electronics Letters
#2,096
of 8,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,523
of 245,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electronics Letters
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,125,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,820 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them