↓ Skip to main content

Effective ultrasonic virtual sources which can be positioned independently of physical aperture focus positions

Overview of attention for article published in Reports in Medical Imaging, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effective ultrasonic virtual sources which can be positioned independently of physical aperture focus positions
Published in
Reports in Medical Imaging, September 2010
DOI 10.2147/rmi.s12801
Authors

Chikayoshi Sumi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 57%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 29%
Student > Master 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 71%
Energy 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,645,091
of 23,277,141 outputs
Outputs from Reports in Medical Imaging
#12
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,411
of 95,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reports in Medical Imaging
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,277,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one scored the same or higher as 29 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them