↓ Skip to main content

Differences in carotid arterial morphology and composition between individuals with and without obstructive coronary artery disease: A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in carotid arterial morphology and composition between individuals with and without obstructive coronary artery disease: A cardiovascular magnetic resonance study
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2008
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-10-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hunter R Underhill, Chun Yuan, James G Terry, Haiying Chen, Mark A Espeland, Thomas S Hatsukami, Tobias Saam, Baocheng Chu, Wei Yu, Minako Oikawa, Norihide Takaya, Vasily L Yarnykh, Robert Kraft, J Jeffrey Carr, Joseph Maldjian, Rong Tang, John R Crouse

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Spain 1 3%
India 1 3%
Unknown 35 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 13 33%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 54%
Computer Science 4 10%
Engineering 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,531,374
of 25,363,868 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#649
of 1,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,983
of 96,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,868 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.