↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the sources and magnitude of diurnal nitrate variability in the San Joaquin River (California) with anin situoptical nitrate sensor and dual nitrate isotopes

Overview of attention for article published in Freshwater Biology, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the sources and magnitude of diurnal nitrate variability in the San Joaquin River (California) with anin situoptical nitrate sensor and dual nitrate isotopes
Published in
Freshwater Biology, February 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02111.x
Authors

BRIAN A. PELLERIN, BRYAN D. DOWNING, CAROL KENDALL, RANDY A. DAHLGREN, TAMARA E. C. KRAUS, JOHNFRANCO SARACENO, ROBERT G. M. SPENCER, BRIAN A. BERGAMASCHI

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Austria 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 87 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 26%
Student > Master 24 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Professor 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 45 46%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 12%
Unspecified 10 10%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,721,467
of 12,733,544 outputs
Outputs from Freshwater Biology
#418
of 1,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,721
of 262,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Freshwater Biology
#19
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,733,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.