↓ Skip to main content

Dogs' Social Referencing towards Owners and Strangers

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
22 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
17 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dogs' Social Referencing towards Owners and Strangers
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0047653
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabella Merola, Emanuela Prato-Previde, Sarah Marshall-Pescini

Abstract

Social referencing is a process whereby an individual uses the emotional information provided by an informant about a novel object/stimulus to guide his/her own future behaviour towards it. In this study adult dogs were tested in a social referencing paradigm involving a potentially scary object with either their owner or a stranger acting as the informant and delivering either a positive or negative emotional message. The aim was to evaluate the influence of the informant's identity on the dogs' referential looking behaviour and behavioural regulation when the message was delivered using only vocal and facial emotional expressions. Results show that most dogs looked referentially at the informant, regardless of his/her identity. Furthermore, when the owner acted as the informant dogs that received a positive emotional message changed their behaviour, looking at him/her more often and spending more time approaching the object and close to it; conversely, dogs that were given a negative message took longer to approach the object and to interact with it. Fewer differences in the dog's behaviour emerged when the informant was the stranger, suggesting that the dog-informant relationship may influence the dog's behavioural regulation. Results are discussed in relation to studies on human-dog communication, attachment, mood modification and joint attention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 3 1%
Hungary 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 240 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 17%
Student > Bachelor 40 16%
Student > Master 35 14%
Researcher 29 12%
Other 21 8%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 52 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 29%
Psychology 48 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 31 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 65 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#437,179
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,125
of 220,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,273
of 186,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#93
of 4,581 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,581 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.