↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of assumptions underlying models of prokaryotic pangenome evolution

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of assumptions underlying models of prokaryotic pangenome evolution
Published in
BMC Biology, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12915-021-00960-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sela, Itamar, Wolf, Yuri I., Koonin, Eugene V.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,944,006
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biology
#457
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,314
of 550,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 550,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them