↓ Skip to main content

Probing Subunit-Subunit Interactions in the Yeast Vacuolar ATPase by Peptide Arrays

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Probing Subunit-Subunit Interactions in the Yeast Vacuolar ATPase by Peptide Arrays
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0046960
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lee S. Parsons, Stephan Wilkens

Abstract

Vacuolar (H(+))-ATPase (V-ATPase; V(1)V(o)-ATPase) is a large multisubunit enzyme complex found in the endomembrane system of all eukaryotic cells where its proton pumping action serves to acidify subcellular organelles. In the plasma membrane of certain specialized tissues, V-ATPase functions to pump protons from the cytoplasm into the extracellular space. The activity of the V-ATPase is regulated by a reversible dissociation mechanism that involves breaking and re-forming of protein-protein interactions in the V(1)-ATPase - V(o)-proton channel interface. The mechanism responsible for regulated V-ATPase dissociation is poorly understood, largely due to a lack of detailed knowledge of the molecular interactions that are responsible for the structural and functional link between the soluble ATPase and membrane bound proton channel domains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 8%
United States 2 8%
Japan 1 4%
Unknown 20 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 44%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 24%
Psychology 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2014.
All research outputs
#4,487,899
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#61,332
of 193,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,800
of 173,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#967
of 4,566 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,566 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.