You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Field-of-study mismatch and overqualification: labour market correlates and their wage penalty
|
---|---|
Published in |
IZA Journal of Labor Economics , January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40172-016-0052-x |
Authors |
Guillermo Montt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 143 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
Researcher | 18 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 16% |
Unknown | 47 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 33 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 29 | 20% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 8% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
Other | 10 | 7% |
Unknown | 53 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,645,563
of 23,278,709 outputs
Outputs from IZA Journal of Labor Economics
#37
of 65 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,711
of 421,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IZA Journal of Labor Economics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,278,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.