↓ Skip to main content

The Lung Microbiome in Moderate and Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
360 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Lung Microbiome in Moderate and Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0047305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexa A. Pragman, Hyeun Bum Kim, Cavan S. Reilly, Christine Wendt, Richard E. Isaacson

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an inflammatory disorder characterized by incompletely reversible airflow obstruction. Bacterial infection of the lower respiratory tract contributes to approximately 50% of COPD exacerbations. Even during periods of stable lung function, the lung harbors a community of bacteria, termed the microbiome. The role of the lung microbiome in the pathogenesis of COPD remains unknown. The COPD lung microbiome, like the healthy lung microbiome, appears to reflect microaspiration of oral microflora. Here we describe the COPD lung microbiome of 22 patients with Moderate or Severe COPD compared to 10 healthy control patients. The composition of the lung microbiomes was determined using 454 pyrosequencing of 16S rDNA found in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Sequences were analyzed using mothur, Ribosomal Database Project, Fast UniFrac, and Metastats. Our results showed a significant increase in microbial diversity with the development of COPD. The main phyla in all samples were Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria. Principal coordinate analyses demonstrated separation of control and COPD samples, but samples did not cluster based on disease severity. However, samples did cluster based on the use of inhaled corticosteroids and inhaled bronchodilators. Metastats analyses demonstrated an increased abundance of several oral bacteria in COPD samples.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
India 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 336 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 20%
Researcher 57 16%
Student > Master 36 10%
Student > Bachelor 33 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Other 64 18%
Unknown 67 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 72 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 43 12%
Chemistry 6 2%
Other 25 7%
Unknown 72 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,596,652
of 24,953,268 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#47,217
of 216,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,685
of 179,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#764
of 4,577 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,953,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,577 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.