↓ Skip to main content

Surgical decision making in premenopausal BRCA carriers considering risk-reducing early salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Genetics, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical decision making in premenopausal BRCA carriers considering risk-reducing early salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy: a qualitative study
Published in
Journal of Medical Genetics, February 2021
DOI 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107501
Pubmed ID
Authors

Faiza Gaba, Shivam Goyal, Dalya Marks, Dhivya Chandrasekaran, Olivia Evans, Sadiyah Robbani, Charlotte Tyson, Rosa Legood, Ertan Saridogan, W Glenn McCluggage, Helen Hanson, Naveena Singh, D Gareth Evans, Usha Menon, Ranjit Manchanda, Raji Ganesan, Gareth Bryson, Gareth Rowlands, Rupali Arora, Munaza Ahmed, Aarti Sharma, Gautam Mehra, Adam Rosenthal, Michelle Mackintosh, Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami, Omer Devaja, Sudha Sundar, Janos Balega, Tim Duncan, Claire Newton, Sonali Kaushik, Angela Brady, Supratik Chattopadhyay, Natalia Povolotskaya, Iain Cameron, Rema Iyer, Lucy Side, Katie Snape, Anil Tailor, Kavitha Thumuluru Madhuri, Katherine Edey, Sian Taylor, Manon van Seters, Suma Kodiathodi, Partha Sengupta, Scott Fegan, Karin Williamson, Andrew Phillips, Mark Willett, Tony Chalhoub, Sanjay Rao, Nicholas Matthews, Beena Abdul, Claire Park, Jane Borley, Ibraheem Hamoodi, Richard Hutson, Kerryn Lutchman-Singh, Richard Peevor, Mahalakshmi Gurumurthy, Kalpana Ragupathy, Emma Crosbie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 34 64%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 34 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#994,847
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Genetics
#57
of 3,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,370
of 541,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Genetics
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 541,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.