You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Northern Elephant Seals Memorize the Rhythm and Timbre of Their Rivals’ Voices
|
---|---|
Published in |
Current Biology, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.035 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nicolas Mathevon, Caroline Casey, Colleen Reichmuth, Isabelle Charrier |
Abstract |
Crocodilians are known to vocalize within the egg shortly before hatching [1,2]. Although a possible function of these calls - inducing hatching in siblings and stimulating the adult female to open the nest - has already been suggested, it has never been experimentally tested [1-5]. Here, we present the first experimental evidence that pre-hatching calls of Nile crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) juveniles are informative acoustic signals which indeed target both siblings and mother. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 20% |
United States | 3 | 9% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
Senegal | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 51% |
Scientists | 14 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 24 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
Professor | 5 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 14% |
Unknown | 17 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 38% |
Neuroscience | 13 | 13% |
Psychology | 10 | 10% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 4% |
Linguistics | 2 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 13% |
Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 361. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#87,293
of 25,225,928 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#535
of 14,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,989
of 323,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#12
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,225,928 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.