You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ants of Brazil: an overview based on 50 years of diversity studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematics and Biodiversity, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1080/14772000.2022.2089268 |
| Authors |
Rodrigo M. Feitosa, Gabriela P. Camacho, Thiago S. R. Silva, Mônica A. Ulysséa, Natalia Ladino, Aline M. Oliveira, Emília Z. Albuquerque, Fernando A. Schmidt, Carla R. Ribas, Anselmo Nogueira, Fabrício B. Baccaro, Antônio C. M. Queiroz, Wesley Dáttilo, Rogério R. Silva, Jean C. Santos, Ananza M. Rabello, Maria Santina De C. Morini, Yves P. Quinet, Kleber Del-Claro, Ana Y. Harada, Karine S. Carvalho, Tathiana G. Sobrinho, Aline B. Moraes, André B. Vargas, Helena Maura Torezan-Silingardi, Jorge Luiz P. Souza, Tatianne Marques, Thiago Izzo, Denise Lange, Iracenir A. Santos, Larissa Nahas, Lucas Paolucci, Stela A. Soares, Cinthia B. Costa-Milanez, Eduardo Diehl-Fleig, Renata B. F. Campos, Ricardo Solar, Tiago Frizzo, Wesley Darocha |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 12 | 20% |
| United States | 8 | 14% |
| Germany | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 30 | 51% |
| Members of the public | 25 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 32% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,064,063
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Systematics and Biodiversity
#23
of 424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,317
of 436,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematics and Biodiversity
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.