↓ Skip to main content

Statistical methods for detecting differentially methylated loci and regions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistical methods for detecting differentially methylated loci and regions
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark D. Robinson, Abdullah Kahraman, Charity W. Law, Helen Lindsay, Malgorzata Nowicka, Lukas M. Weber, Xiaobei Zhou

Abstract

DNA methylation, the reversible addition of methyl groups at CpG dinucleotides, represents an important regulatory layer associated with gene expression. Changed methylation status has been noted across diverse pathological states, including cancer. The rapid development and uptake of microarrays and large scale DNA sequencing has prompted an explosion of data analytic methods for processing and discovering changes in DNA methylation across varied data types. In this mini-review, we present a compact and accessible discussion of many of the salient challenges, such as experimental design, statistical methods for differential methylation detection, critical considerations such as cell type composition and the potential confounding that can arise from batch effects. From a statistical perspective, our main interests include the use of empirical Bayes or hierarchical models, which have proved immensely powerful in genomics, and the procedures by which false discovery control is achieved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 334 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 98 28%
Researcher 82 23%
Student > Master 35 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 42 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 132 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 73 21%
Mathematics 22 6%
Computer Science 17 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 5%
Other 35 10%
Unknown 54 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,482,021
of 24,875,286 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,003
of 13,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,417
of 231,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#14
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,875,286 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,399 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.