↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic Reprograming in Macrophage Polarization

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
739 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
904 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metabolic Reprograming in Macrophage Polarization
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00420
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Galván-Peña, Luke A. J. O’Neill

Abstract

Studying the metabolism of immune cells in recent years has emphasized the tight link existing between the metabolic state and the phenotype of these cells. Macrophages in particular are a good example of this phenomenon. Whether the macrophage obtains its energy through glycolysis or through oxidative metabolism can give rise to different phenotypes. Classically activated or M1 macrophages are key players of the first line of defense against bacterial infections and are known to obtain energy through glycolysis. Alternatively activated or M2 macrophages on the other hand are involved in tissue repair and wound healing and use oxidative metabolism to fuel their longer-term functions. Metabolic intermediates, however, are not just a source of energy but can be directly implicated in a particular macrophage phenotype. In M1 macrophages, the Krebs cycle intermediate succinate regulates HIF1α, which is responsible for driving the sustained production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL1β. In M2 macrophages, the sedoheptulose kinase carbohydrate kinase-like protein is critical for regulating the pentose phosphate pathway. The potential to target these events and impact on disease is an exciting prospect.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 904 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 879 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 205 23%
Student > Master 132 15%
Researcher 129 14%
Student > Bachelor 106 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 5%
Other 105 12%
Unknown 178 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 183 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 159 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 142 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 85 9%
Neuroscience 27 3%
Other 93 10%
Unknown 215 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,184,741
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#14,218
of 31,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,823
of 248,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#67
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.