You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Detrimental Impact of Microbiota-Accessible Carbohydrate-Deprived Diet on Gut and Immune Homeostasis: An Overview
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in immunology, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00548 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire Immediato Daïen, Gabriela Veronica Pinget, Jian Kai Tan, Laurence Macia |
| Abstract |
Dietary fibers are non-digestible polysaccharides functionally known as microbiota-accessible carbohydrates (MACs), present in inadequate amounts in the Western diet. MACs are a main source of energy for gut bacteria so the abundance and variety of MACs can modulate gut microbial composition and function. This, in turn, impacts host immunity and health. In preclinical studies, MAC-deprived diet and disruption of gut homeostasis aggravate the development of inflammatory diseases, such as allergies, infections, and autoimmune diseases. The present review provides a synopsis on the impact of a low-MAC diet on gut homeostasis or, more specifically, on gut microbiota, gut epithelium, and immune cells. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 12% |
| Spain | 14 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 8% |
| Canada | 7 | 6% |
| Mexico | 5 | 4% |
| India | 5 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 52 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 83 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 18% |
| Scientists | 17 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 187 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 44 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 54 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#517,122
of 25,613,746 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#473
of 32,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,606
of 325,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#6
of 382 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,613,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 382 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.