↓ Skip to main content

S100 Proteins As an Important Regulator of Macrophage Inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
13 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
419 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
S100 Proteins As an Important Regulator of Macrophage Inflammation
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, January 2018
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01908
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chang Xia, Zachary Braunstein, Amelia C. Toomey, Jixin Zhong, Xiaoquan Rao

Abstract

The S100 proteins, a family of calcium-binding cytosolic proteins, have a broad range of intracellular and extracellular functions through regulating calcium balance, cell apoptosis, migration, proliferation, differentiation, energy metabolism, and inflammation. The intracellular functions of S100 proteins involve interaction with intracellular receptors, membrane protein recruitment/transportation, transcriptional regulation and integrating with enzymes or nucleic acids, and DNA repair. The S100 proteins could also be released from the cytoplasm, induced by tissue/cell damage and cellular stress. The extracellular S100 proteins, serving as a danger signal, are crucial in regulating immune homeostasis, post-traumatic injury, and inflammation. Extracellular S100 proteins are also considered biomarkers for some specific diseases. In this review, we will discuss the multi-functional roles of S100 proteins, especially their potential roles associated with cell migration, differentiation, tissue repair, and inflammation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 419 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 21%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Researcher 39 9%
Student > Master 36 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 61 15%
Unknown 127 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 66 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 44 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 8%
Neuroscience 18 4%
Other 60 14%
Unknown 145 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,502,979
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#1,324
of 32,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,766
of 456,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#34
of 614 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 614 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.