↓ Skip to main content

Honey’s Ability to Counter Bacterial Infections Arises from Both Bactericidal Compounds and QS Inhibition

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Honey’s Ability to Counter Bacterial Infections Arises from Both Bactericidal Compounds and QS Inhibition
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00144
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rui Wang, Melissa Starkey, Ronen Hazan, Laurence G. Rahme

Abstract

The ability of honey to kill bacterial pathogens in vitro and quickly clear even chronic or drug-resistant infections has been demonstrated by several studies. Most current research is focused on identifying the bactericidal compounds in honey, but the action of the compounds discovered is not sufficient to explain honey's activity. By diluting honey to sub-inhibitory levels, we were able to study its impact on bacterial coordinated behavior, and discovered that honey inhibits bacterial quorum sensing (QS). Experiments to characterize and quantify honey's effect on the QS networks of Pseudomonas aeruginosa revealed that low concentrations of honey inhibited the expression of MvfR, las, and rhl regulons, including the associated virulence factors. This research also establishes that inhibition of QS is associated with honey's sugar content. Therefore, honey combats infections by two independent mechanisms acting in tandem: bactericidal components, which actively kill cells, and disruption of QS, which weakens bacterial coordination and virulence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 97 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 21%
Student > Master 17 17%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#547,620
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#288
of 27,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,004
of 252,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#4
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.