↓ Skip to main content

Anti-biofilm Activity as a Health Issue

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anti-biofilm Activity as a Health Issue
Published in
Frontiers in Microbiology, April 2016
DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00592
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sylvie Miquel, Rosyne Lagrafeuille, Bertrand Souweine, Christiane Forestier

Abstract

The formation and persistence of surface-attached microbial communities, known as biofilms, are responsible for 75% of human microbial infections (National Institutes of Health). Biofilm lifestyle confers several advantages to the pathogens, notably during the colonization process of medical devices and/or patients' organs. In addition, sessile bacteria have a high tolerance to exogenous stress including anti-infectious agents. Biofilms are highly competitive communities and some microorganisms exhibit anti-biofilm capacities such as bacterial growth inhibition, exclusion or competition, which enable them to acquire advantages and become dominant. The deciphering and control of anti-biofilm properties represent future challenges in human infection control. The aim of this review is to compare and discuss the mechanisms of natural bacterial anti-biofilm strategies/mechanisms recently identified in pathogenic, commensal and probiotic bacteria and the main synthetic strategies used in clinical practice, particularly for catheter-related infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 339 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 19%
Student > Master 33 10%
Researcher 31 9%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 114 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 34 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 4%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 130 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,404,780
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#12,083
of 29,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,037
of 313,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#288
of 565 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 565 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.