Title |
Weak Broadband Electromagnetic Fields are More Disruptive to Magnetic Compass Orientation in a Night-Migratory Songbird (Erithacus rubecula) than Strong Narrow-Band Fields
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00055 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Susanne Schwarze, Nils-Lasse Schneider, Thomas Reichl, David Dreyer, Nele Lefeldt, Svenja Engels, Neville Baker, P. J. Hore, Henrik Mouritsen |
Abstract |
Magnetic compass orientation in night-migratory songbirds is embedded in the visual system and seems to be based on a light-dependent radical pair mechanism. Recent findings suggest that both broadband electromagnetic fields ranging from ~2 kHz to ~9 MHz and narrow-band fields at the so-called Larmor frequency for a free electron in the Earth's magnetic field can disrupt this mechanism. However, due to local magnetic fields generated by nuclear spins, effects specific to the Larmor frequency are difficult to understand considering that the primary sensory molecule should be organic and probably a protein. We therefore constructed a purpose-built laboratory and tested the orientation capabilities of European robins in an electromagnetically silent environment, under the specific influence of four different oscillating narrow-band electromagnetic fields, at the Larmor frequency, double the Larmor frequency, 1.315 MHz or 50 Hz, and in the presence of broadband electromagnetic noise covering the range from ~2 kHz to ~9 MHz. Our results indicated that the magnetic compass orientation of European robins could not be disrupted by any of the relatively strong narrow-band electromagnetic fields employed here, but that the weak broadband field very efficiently disrupted their orientation. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Colombia | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 84 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 21% |
Researcher | 9 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 18% |
Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 26% |
Chemistry | 8 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 15% |
Unknown | 23 | 27% |