The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Onset and Progression of Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity Deficits in the Q175FDN Mouse Model of Huntington Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2019.00326 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jade G. Quirion, Matthew P. Parsons |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 11 | 31% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 14% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Psychology | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,492,614
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#873
of 4,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,147
of 315,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#39
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.