↓ Skip to main content

Computed tomography hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch vs. automated perfusion mismatch to identify stroke patients eligible for thrombolysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computed tomography hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch vs. automated perfusion mismatch to identify stroke patients eligible for thrombolysis
Published in
Frontiers in Neurology, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2023.1320620
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter B. Sporns, André Kemmling, Lennart Meyer, Christos Krogias, Volker Puetz, Kolja M. Thierfelder, Marco Duering, Carsten Lukas, Daniel Kaiser, Sönke Langner, Alex Brehm, Lukas T. Rotkopf, Wolfgang G. Kunz, Carolin Beuker, Walter Heindel, Jens Fiehler, Peter Schramm, Heinz Wiendl, Heike Minnerup, Marios Nikos Psychogios, Jens Minnerup

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,933,665
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurology
#4,958
of 14,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,275
of 349,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurology
#88
of 579 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 579 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.