You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Atypical coordination of cortical oscillations in response to speech in autism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00171 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Delphine Jochaut, Katia Lehongre, Ana Saitovitch, Anne-Dominique Devauchelle, Itsaso Olasagasti, Nadia Chabane, Monica Zilbovicius, Anne-Lise Giraud |
| Abstract |
Subjects with autism often show language difficulties, but it is unclear how they relate to neurophysiological anomalies of cortical speech processing. We used combined EEG and fMRI in 13 subjects with autism and 13 control participants and show that in autism, gamma and theta cortical activity do not engage synergistically in response to speech. Theta activity in left auditory cortex fails to track speech modulations, and to down-regulate gamma oscillations in the group with autism. This deficit predicts the severity of both verbal impairment and autism symptoms in the affected sample. Finally, we found that oscillation-based connectivity between auditory and other language cortices is altered in autism. These results suggest that the verbal disorder in autism could be associated with an altered balance of slow and fast auditory oscillations, and that this anomaly could compromise the mapping between sensory input and higher-level cognitive representations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 36 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 28 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 9% |
| Linguistics | 8 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 37 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2018.
All research outputs
#947,339
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#448
of 7,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,212
of 263,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#25
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.