↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the Virtual Reality Neuroscience Questionnaire: Maximum Duration of Immersive Virtual Reality Sessions Without the Presence of Pertinent Adverse Symptomatology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of the Virtual Reality Neuroscience Questionnaire: Maximum Duration of Immersive Virtual Reality Sessions Without the Presence of Pertinent Adverse Symptomatology
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, November 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00417
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panagiotis Kourtesis, Simona Collina, Leonidas A. A. Doumas, Sarah E. MacPherson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 211 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Master 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 87 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 26 12%
Psychology 22 10%
Neuroscience 13 6%
Social Sciences 13 6%
Engineering 12 6%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 97 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,034,728
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#1,399
of 7,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,359
of 478,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#16
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.