You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Open Anatomy Browser: A Collaborative Web-Based Viewer for Interoperable Anatomy Atlases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fninf.2017.00022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Halle, Valentin Demeusy, Ron Kikinis |
| Abstract |
The Open Anatomy Browser (OABrowser) is an open source, web-based, zero-installation anatomy atlas viewer based on current web browser technologies and evolving anatomy atlas interoperability standards. OABrowser displays three-dimensional anatomical models, image cross-sections of labeled structures and source radiological imaging, and a text-based hierarchy of structures. The viewer includes novel collaborative tools: users can save bookmarks of atlas views for later access and exchange those bookmarks with other users, and dynamic shared views allow groups of users can participate in a collaborative interactive atlas viewing session. We have published several anatomy atlases (an MRI-derived brain atlas and atlases of other parts of the anatomy) to demonstrate OABrowser's functionality. The atlas source data, processing tools, and the source for OABrowser are freely available through GitHub and are distributed under a liberal open source license. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 20% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| Honduras | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Kazakhstan | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 48% |
| Scientists | 10 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 36% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 20% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 6 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2018.
All research outputs
#2,133,845
of 25,362,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#67
of 828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,256
of 315,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.