↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary Basis of Human Running and Its Impact on Neural Function

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 1,410)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
39 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolutionary Basis of Human Running and Its Impact on Neural Function
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, July 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jay Schulkin

Abstract

Running is not unique to humans, but it is seemingly a basic human capacity. This article addresses the evolutionary origins of humans running long distances, the basic physical capability of running, and the neurogenesis of aerobic fitness. This article more specifically speaks to the conditions that set the stage for the act of running, and then looks at brain expression, and longer-term consequences of running within a context of specific morphological features and diverse information molecules that participate in our capacity for running and sport. While causal factors are not known, we do know that physiological factors are involved in running and underlie neural function. Multiple themes about running are discussed in this article, including neurogenesis, neural plasticity, and memory enhancement. Aerobic exercise increases anterior hippocampus size. This expansion is linked to the improvement of memory, which reflects the improvement of learning as a function of running activity in animal studies. Higher fitness is associated with greater expansion, not only of the hippocampus, but of several other brain regions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 106 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 17 16%
Psychology 14 13%
Sports and Recreations 13 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 26 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 173. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#238,200
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#11
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,655
of 371,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.