You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An Evaluation of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Perceived Social Distancing Policies in Relation to Planning, Selecting, and Preparing Healthy Meals: An Observational Study in 38 Countries Worldwide
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2020.621726 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlotte De Backer, Lauranna Teunissen, Isabelle Cuykx, Paulien Decorte, Sara Pabian, Sarah Gerritsen, Christophe Matthys, Haleama Al Sabbah, Kathleen Van Royen, the Corona Cooking Survey Study Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 14 | 34% |
| Belgium | 4 | 10% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 24% |
| Scientists | 9 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 152 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 66 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 11% |
| Psychology | 10 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 36 | 24% |
| Unknown | 68 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,325,965
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#583
of 6,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,699
of 538,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#24
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 538,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.