You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Structural and physicochemical effects on the starch quality of the high-quality wheat genotype caused by delayed sowing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1389745 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaomei Huang, Xin Zhou, Xueqing Liu, Wen Zhong, Xinyu Wang, Zhengchun Ju, Yan Yin, Qingguo Xin, Ning Liu, Ximei Liu, Yuli Jin, Guie Wang, Jiangchun Wang, Pengtao Ma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,948,871
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#4,526
of 6,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,775
of 144,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#125
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.