You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Polarized training has greater impact on key endurance variables than threshold, high intensity, or high volume training
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2014.00033 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Stöggl, Billy Sperlich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 223 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 27 | 12% |
| United States | 26 | 12% |
| Spain | 13 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 13 | 6% |
| Australia | 13 | 6% |
| France | 9 | 4% |
| Japan | 5 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 78 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 154 | 69% |
| Scientists | 43 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 843 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 820 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 160 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 153 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 86 | 10% |
| Researcher | 64 | 8% |
| Other | 39 | 5% |
| Other | 150 | 18% |
| Unknown | 191 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 427 | 51% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 2% |
| Other | 69 | 8% |
| Unknown | 209 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 409. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#73,827
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#35
of 15,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#560
of 321,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#1
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.