↓ Skip to main content

Gut Microbiota Modification: Another Piece in the Puzzle of the Benefits of Physical Exercise in Health?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
72 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
479 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gut Microbiota Modification: Another Piece in the Puzzle of the Benefits of Physical Exercise in Health?
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2016.00051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Begoña Cerdá, Margarita Pérez, Jennifer D. Pérez-Santiago, Jose F. Tornero-Aguilera, Rocío González-Soltero, Mar Larrosa

Abstract

Regular physical exercise provides many health benefits, protecting against the development of chronic diseases, and improving quality of life. Some of the mechanisms by which exercise provides these effects are the promotion of an anti-inflammatory state, reinforcement of the neuromuscular function, and activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Recently, it has been proposed that physical exercise is able to modify gut microbiota, and thus this could be another factor by which exercise promotes well-being, since gut microbiota appears to be closely related to health and disease. The purpose of this paper is to review the recent findings on gut microbiota modification by exercise, proposing several mechanisms by which physical exercise might cause changes in gut microbiota.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 479 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 473 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 77 16%
Student > Bachelor 61 13%
Researcher 55 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 11%
Student > Postgraduate 31 6%
Other 95 20%
Unknown 108 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 9%
Sports and Recreations 37 8%
Other 84 18%
Unknown 133 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#294,660
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#159
of 15,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,085
of 312,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#5
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.