You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implicit Memory in Music and Language
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00211 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc Ettlinger, Elizabeth H. Margulis, Patrick C. M. Wong |
| Abstract |
Research on music and language in recent decades has focused on their overlapping neurophysiological, perceptual, and cognitive underpinnings, ranging from the mechanism for encoding basic auditory cues to the mechanism for detecting violations in phrase structure. These overlaps have most often been identified in musicians with musical knowledge that was acquired explicitly, through formal training. In this paper, we review independent bodies of work in music and language that suggest an important role for implicitly acquired knowledge, implicit memory, and their associated neural structures in the acquisition of linguistic or musical grammar. These findings motivate potential new work that examines music and language comparatively in the context of the implicit memory system. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Norway | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 16% |
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 57 | 28% |
| Arts and Humanities | 28 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 9% |
| Linguistics | 13 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,022,184
of 25,240,298 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,128
of 34,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,819
of 193,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#29
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,240,298 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.