↓ Skip to main content

Primum Non Nocere: An Evolutionary Analysis of Whether Antidepressants Do More Harm than Good

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
219 X users
facebook
25 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
pinterest
1 Pinner
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primum Non Nocere: An Evolutionary Analysis of Whether Antidepressants Do More Harm than Good
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul W. Andrews, J. Anderson Thomson, Ananda Amstadter, Michael C. Neale

Abstract

Antidepressant medications are the first-line treatment for people meeting current diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder. Most antidepressants are designed to perturb the mechanisms that regulate the neurotransmitter serotonin - an evolutionarily ancient biochemical found in plants, animals, and fungi. Many adaptive processes evolved to be regulated by serotonin, including emotion, development, neuronal growth and death, platelet activation and the clotting process, attention, electrolyte balance, and reproduction. It is a principle of evolutionary medicine that the disruption of evolved adaptations will degrade biological functioning. Because serotonin regulates many adaptive processes, antidepressants could have many adverse health effects. For instance, while antidepressants are modestly effective in reducing depressive symptoms, they increase the brain's susceptibility to future episodes after they have been discontinued. Contrary to a widely held belief in psychiatry, studies that purport to show that antidepressants promote neurogenesis are flawed because they all use a method that cannot, by itself, distinguish between neurogenesis and neuronal death. In fact, antidepressants cause neuronal damage and mature neurons to revert to an immature state, both of which may explain why antidepressants also cause neurons to undergo apoptosis (programmed death). Antidepressants can also cause developmental problems, they have adverse effects on sexual and romantic life, and they increase the risk of hyponatremia (low sodium in the blood plasma), bleeding, stroke, and death in the elderly. Our review supports the conclusion that antidepressants generally do more harm than good by disrupting a number of adaptive processes regulated by serotonin. However, there may be specific conditions for which their use is warranted (e.g., cancer, recovery from stroke). We conclude that altered informed consent practices and greater caution in the prescription of antidepressants are warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 219 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Canada 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 259 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 17%
Researcher 40 14%
Student > Master 34 12%
Other 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 10%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 50 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 96 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 53 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 9%
Neuroscience 14 5%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 54 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 197. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#205,016
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#441
of 34,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#927
of 251,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#9
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.