You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of Socioeconomic Status, Parent–Child Relationship, and Learning Motivation on Reading Ability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01297 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qishan Chen, Yurou Kong, Wenyang Gao, Lei Mo |
| Abstract |
Against the background of Chinese culture, we investigated the relationship between family socioeconomic status (SES) and children's reading ability. Participants included 2294 middle-school students in grade 8. SES was measured by parents' education level, parents' occupational prestige, and family property, and children's reading ability was estimated with item response theory. In addition, we adopted an 8-item parent-child relationship scale and a 22-item learning motivation scale that included four dimensions. We examined whether the parent-child relationship mediated the relationship between family SES and reading ability and whether this was moderated by learning motivation. The results indicated that the parent-child relationship played a mediating role in the relationship between SES and reading ability. This relationship was moderated by students' learning motivation. The direct effects of SES on reading ability at high, medium, and low levels of learning motivation were 0.24, 0.32, and 0.40, respectively. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| India | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 491 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 491 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 4% |
| Researcher | 20 | 4% |
| Other | 66 | 13% |
| Unknown | 252 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 52 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 21 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 17 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 83 | 17% |
| Unknown | 266 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,195,550
of 25,270,999 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,693
of 34,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,712
of 336,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#383
of 731 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,270,999 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 731 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.