You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is the Student-Centered Learning Style More Effective Than the Teacher-Student Double-Centered Learning Style in Improving Reading Performance?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02630 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yang Dong, Sammy Xiaoying Wu, Weisha Wang, Shuna Peng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 145 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 60 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 14 | 10% |
| Psychology | 14 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 62 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2021.
All research outputs
#13,143,606
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,196
of 30,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,219
of 459,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#283
of 567 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 567 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.