↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Related Coronaviruses Circulating in Sunda pangolins (Manis javanica) Confiscated From the Illegal Wildlife Trade in Viet Nam

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
37 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
110 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Related Coronaviruses Circulating in Sunda pangolins (Manis javanica) Confiscated From the Illegal Wildlife Trade in Viet Nam
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, March 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.826116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nguyen Thi Thanh Nga, Alice Latinne, Hoang Bich Thuy, Nguyen Van Long, Pham Thi Bich Ngoc, Nguyen Thi Lan Anh, Nguyen Van Thai, Tran Quang Phuong, Hoang Van Thai, Lam Kim Hai, Pham Thanh Long, Nguyen Thanh Phuong, Vo Van Hung, Le Tin Vinh Quang, Nguyen Thi Lan, Nguyen Thi Hoa, Christine K Johnson, Jonna A K Mazet, Scott I Roberton, Chris Walzer, Sarah H Olson, Amanda E Fine

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 29 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 31 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 338. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2024.
All research outputs
#104,437
of 26,239,416 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#77
of 15,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,316
of 455,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#6
of 932 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,239,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 932 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.