↓ Skip to main content

Correlation between dietary information sources and knowledge of adequate diets in Eastern China

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Public Health, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correlation between dietary information sources and knowledge of adequate diets in Eastern China
Published in
Frontiers in Public Health, September 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.955766
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bin Cui, Linda Dong-Ling Wang, Fu Rong Wang, Jing Peng, Jian Ying, Xiang Chen, Mei Yin Xu, Jun Ke, Yi Tian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#19,000,862
of 23,555,482 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#6,356
of 11,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,989
of 438,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#776
of 1,397 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,555,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,397 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.