↓ Skip to main content

Modelling the Toxicity of Nanoparticles

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Assessment of Human Exposure to ENMs.
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Assessment of Human Exposure to ENMs.
Chapter number 2
Book title
Modelling the Toxicity of Nanoparticles
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-47754-1_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-947752-7, 978-3-31-947754-1
Authors

Araceli Sánchez Jiménez, Martie van Tongeren, Jiménez, Araceli Sánchez, van Tongeren, Martie

Editors

Lang Tran, Miguel A. Bañares, Robert Rallo

Abstract

Human exposure assessment of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) is hampered, among other factors, by the difficulty to differentiate ENM from other nanomaterials (incidental to processes or naturally occurring) and the lack of a single metric that can be used for health risk assessment. It is important that the exposure assessment is carried out throughout the entire life-cycle as releases can occur at the different stages of the product life-cycle, from the synthesis, manufacture of the nano-enable product (occupational exposure) to the professional and consumer use of nano-enabled product (consumer exposure) and at the end of life.Occupational exposure surveys should follow a tiered approach, increasing in complexity in terms of instruments used and sampling strategy applied with higher tiers in order tailor the exposure assessment to the specific materials used and workplace exposure scenarios and to reduce uncertainty in assessment of exposure. Assessment of consumer exposure and of releases from end-of-life processes currently relies on release testing of nano-enabled products in laboratory settings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 12%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 6 35%