↓ Skip to main content

透析時血管痛に著効したマイクロコーンによる耳介治療 : 3例報告

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
透析時血管痛に著効したマイクロコーンによる耳介治療 : 3例報告
Published in
Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi, March 2017
DOI 10.4009/jsdt.50.197
Authors

Shigeru Takeuchi, Yasuhiro Ohtsuka, Takashi Hayashi, Nobuo Nagano, Tetsuo Ando, Mitsuru Kobayashi

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2024.
All research outputs
#16,356,919
of 26,614,447 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi
#71
of 173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,883
of 327,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,614,447 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 173 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them